Skip to main content

Featured Post

California just made a huge positive step in Healthcare

Governor Jerry Brown made California the fourth state in the US on Monday to allow physician assisted dying. Yes, only the fourth, and it's disappointing that the numbers (or the lack of) overshadow the real achievement. Everyone has the right to live, and everyone should have the right to die. Of course life is sacred, but the opponents of this law must not seriously think that California's true intentions are to have a genocide. They simply just want to help those people who have no hope of a cure, and are suffering. That's it, there is no story here, Everyone is allowed to make their decisions about their life and body. If you can go and get an abortion from a professional, you should also be able to go to your doctor to die. They are there to help you and to lessen your pain. In any way possible. Of course we support that background checks must take place, and several doctors (including psychologists) should sign off before you are allowed to die. You sho

Special Report Part 3: Migrant Crisis Live from Budapest


Budapest is a beautiful city. In fact even in an objective opinion, it can be called one of the most gorgeous creations. It simply is just amazing. It is also sometimes referred to as the centre of Europe, due to its geographical location. However, this year it also became the centre of something else. The migrant crisis that is engulfing the EU. 

The sad truth of the matter is that the demographics  of the world is changing, and we must accept it. There is nothing we can do at this point to change or stop it.

This year already, almost 100,000 migrants have crossed into Hungary alone (and thus the EU) illegally. And many more were probably missed by authorities. The ones who chose this route over the Mediterranean, usually come from warn torn regions such as Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan or from parts of the world where they have few opportunities and bad living conditions such as Pakistan and Kosovo. Many of them travel to Budapest on foot, and sleep with the capital's homeless in public spaces and underpasses.

Of course we want to help these people, and not let them die miserably, but there is only so much that we can do. We can't let everyone in, that would be madness. It already is though. 

Legally, each country has the right to protect its citizens and borders, so it is an acceptable choice that countries such as Hungary are building border fences to keep these people out. We have the right to defend and protect ourselves. Yes, it is true that these actions make us remind of the Berlin Wall, but there is simply nothing else that can be done at this point. 

At least this time we are keeping people out, and not in. Slightly better after 25 years of evolution one might say. 

However, many governments fear that ISIS and Boko Haram terrorists are hiding among the mass influx of people, who disguised as refugees, can get into Europe relatively easily. This is one of the best reasons why it is acceptable to close borders altogether. This is of course only a few individuals among tens of thousands of people, but its already enough for tragedy to happen if one of them gets through. Some may say that this is selfish, and that tragedies happened to these people everyday. But at the end of the day, legally the EU is responsible for its own citizens. It may be hard, but priorities must be made and kept.

Just last week there was an incident on a train from Amsterdam to Paris where a suspected migrant was preparing for a terrorist attack. Luckily, he was stopped last minute. But we may not always be so lucky. 

The other good argument is the question of what is expected of us. Let's continue with the case of Hungary. Hungary has had a massive gypsy minority for a few centuries now, and relations between them and the locals on a national level is simply horrible. They are not integrated into our society, and tensions remain high. If we let in tens of thousands of Afghans, how are they expected to be integrated? We can't even live among gypsies, with whom we speak the same language and partially share Christianity.

It is nonsense. We understand that as human beings, it is our duty to help, but there are limits here. 

We could build migrant centres where all the refugees could live together, apart from us, but this plan has now become unrealistic. 

We can't make accommodations for a 100,000 people. Especially not in a blink of an eye. We can only build fences. But probably even that won't work. It may buy us some time, but that's about it. 

This is why it not acceptable to criticise our governments as being racist or lacking a heart. First and foremost they are responsible for us, and public law and order. They can't just allow a 100,000 people to enter and live on our streets without supplies. Eventually they would want supplies no matter what, and that would endanger the lives and well being of locals. Last year, when only a few thousands of them arrived, the conditions were already horrible, but countries like Hungary took them in. This year that can't be done anymore, as the influx has increased more than ten fold. 

We must accept the fence, and look for other ways to help. Therefore it is the duty of us, the public, to donate and help out the charities who are doing what they can. I urge you to visit the International Red Cross' site where you can find many way to help those who need it the most: https://www.icrc.org/en/support-us/audience/foundations.

This is Part 3, and the finale of the new series: Europe in the 21st Century: Struggles and Solutions. The images used are the property Istvan Bielik (Origo) and Oliviere Morin (AFP). This is an original material of Finchley 1959. 

Comments

  1. Accept the fence? Are you out of your mind? There are people trekking all the way from Syria and you think it's a wise choice to build a wall and keep them out of harms way? Completely inconsiderate and unthought of.

    ReplyDelete
  2. We know what hardships the migrants go through and that they don't get enough help from the government, and that is why we provided a link where donations can be made to help them out. But yes, the fence should be accepted, as every country has the right to protect its borders and citizens from anything. France, Spain, Bulgaria, Israel and many other countries use them too. There is nothing wrong with it. We do agree that building a fence is not certainly the best solution, but it certainly is legal and should be accepted.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Paris was attacked again

EPA On Friday, the 13th of November, everything was normal in Paris. People were happy that the weekend is here, and went out with friends and loved ones for some dinner and drinks, or for their favorite band's concert or cheered for their home nation as France took on Germany in an International friendly. The same night though, the evil also descended on the French capital and took away 130 souls. It was an absolute tragedy. People have been shocked to their cores. It is with great sadness that we write about this topic. It touched us very deeply too. That is partially why it took us so long to reflect on this issue, the other being the fact that there is still so many new developments surfacing continuously. The whole picture is not clear yet. It may never be. What is perhaps one of the most striking facts about this attack beyond the number of casualties, is the fact that this is the second tragedy in Paris this year alone. It has only been 10 months since gunmen at

Christie makes it 7

Iowa and New Hampshire have done their job again. The field is narrowing down, as New Jersey Governor Chris Christie has become the latest candidate to drop out of the Republican race. The outspoken governor was an early frontrunner in this race, however he was hurt by the Bridgegate scandal back home, and was overshadowed in the crowded Establishment/Governor lane and by the rise of political outsiders like Donald Trump. After coming in at 6th place in the Granite State, Christie didn't believe in the race anymore, as he put all his eggs in one basket. It worked for Kasich, not for Christie, and that is why we are saying bye to him now. In the run-up to the 2012 election, Chris Christie was widely favored in the party, and thought of as a potential candidate. He was however not yet ready and did not join, despite the fact that Romney received a surprisingly strong challenge from Rick Santorum, Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich. He did however went on to campaign heavily for Romney la